| Category | Excellent | Good | Needs work |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formatting |
5 Followed all formatting guidelines. |
4 Followed most formatting guidelines. |
3 Missing multiple formatting guidelines. |
| Documentation |
5 Original and downloaded data sources clearly described. |
4 Poor description of original and / or downloaded data sources. |
3 Poor / unclear / missing description of either original or downloaded data source |
| Cleaning |
5 All variables have appropriate names and types |
4 Some variables have appropriate names and types |
3 Variables types and names not adjusted |
| Exploration |
10 / 9 Summary measures and charts appropriately used to address all RQs; excellent summary description. |
8 / 7 / 6 Measures and charts used to address RQs could be improved; adequate summary description. |
5 / 4 / 3 Missing summary measures and / or charts to address RQs; poor summary description. |
| Research questions |
10 / 9 At least 3 RQs are listed and all RQ criteria are met |
8 / 7 / 6 At least 3 RQs are listed and at least one criteria is not met |
5 / 4 / 3 <3 RQs listed and more than one criteria is not met |
| Visualizations |
10 / 9 Visualizations appropriately chosen, polished, and convey clear message addressing RQs. |
8 / 7 / 6 Visualizations are appropriate but could be improved, either on polish or convenying a clear message. |
5 / 4 / 3 Poor match between visualization and data types / relationships. Multiple technical or design flaws and no clear message. |
| Technical things |
5 All code runs without errors; all files included in the submitted .zip file. |
4 Code has only one or two error, otherwise runs; all files included in the submitted .zip file. |
3 Code has multiple errors; submitted .zip file is missing components necessary to reproduce analysis. |